---------------------------------------------------------
Notes

The modifications are the combination of 'uk' and 'aur' into a single lexeme (motivated by other Frisian words such as 'aural', glossed as 'over all' or 'everywhere')

EB> The DELPH-IN processors allow for multi-word entries of the
words-with-spaces type: STEM <"uk", "aur">, so you can take this
analysis without changing the spelling of the example.

LKB(46): (lkb::do-parse-tty "de koptein kum-t en luki-t uk.aur buurd en fraag-t de man sliip-st dü")
  (1) [0:1] |de|
  (2) [1:2] |koptein|
  (3) [2:3] |kum-t|
  (4) [3:4] |en|
  (5) [4:5] |luki-t|
  (6) [5:6] |uk.aur|
  (7) [6:7] |buurd|
  (8) [7:8] |en|
  (9) [8:9] |fraag-t|
  (10) [9:10] |de|
  (11) [10:11] |man|
  (12) [11:12] |sliip-st|
  (13) [12:13] |dü|

No analysis found corresponding to token 4-5 LUKI-T
No parses found

EB> ??

Relative pronouns were analyzed as adjectives that take VP complements. Unorthodox perhaps, but we didn't need any new rules this way.

EB> The instructions say to post to GoPost for help with new
constructions... (and preferably not after the fact ;-)
Also: not only unorthodox, but incredibly unlikely to scale...

diar wiar jens en skep dit silt fan Söld naa Engelönd
diar wiis-t jens en skep dit sil-t fan Söld naa Engelönd
there is-PRET once a ship that sail-PST.PTCP from Söld to England
there once was a ship that sailed from Söld to England

There is still some ambiguity with PP attachment, but the parse with correct attachment seems to have the correct semantics.

EB> Not quite:  You've got _sail_v_rel sharing the LBL of exist_q_rel,
which is clearly wrong.   (I might not have chosen the same parse as you,
but that shouldn't happen in any parse...)







