-------------------------------------------
Comments

There is systematic ambiguity in Frisian as to which determiner to use: a bare NP is completely underspecified for COG-ST, and hence can appear in translations of both definite and indefinite NPs.  Indefinite NPs additionally can appear with the determiner "en", and definite NPs can appear with either "di" or "de" (or "dit" for neuter gender).  This results in a factor of 2 ambiguity for each indefinite NP, and a factor of 3 ambiguity for each definite NP.  That fans out pretty quickly!

EB> If the choice of di/de/dit is at least partially constrained by
gender, any given NP should only be able to take a subset, I'd think.

EB> Also, it's a bit surprising that the articles can mark COG-ST but the
bare NPs are unmarked...

  The behavior is the same whether coming from English or from Italian.  This sentence cannot be generated in Frisian with an edge limit of 10,000 edges.  With an edge limit of 40,000, we can successfully translate it -- with 2592 results!  A cursory inspection suggests that they are all valid, but there are some duplicated results.  Clicking on them seems to produce identical trees for more than one copy of a result, so we aren't sure how to resolve this.

EB> Sounds like you have perhaps some spurious ambiguity?  (i.e., multiple
analyses of the same string with the same MRS.)

