1. Word order 

	I consider any three-place predicate that involves just
	one verb to be a ditransitive, in the broader sense.  So,
	this would include `ntnh'.

	The issues of what happens in wh questions are probably
	beyond the scope of this class, but potentially something
	you might want to pursue further over the summer.

2. Pronouns 

	How many numbers?  How many persons, for that matter?
	
	The double pronouns/pronouns doubling full NPs is interesting,
	but probably not something you need to get into.  The
	question about pronouns having the same distribution as
	NPs has more to do with phenomena where pronouns are clitics
	and therefore show up in funny places.

3. Determiners 
4. Argument optionality 
5. Agreement 

	One wouldn't expect case agreement between verbs and
	arguments, but between nouns and their dependents.
	(Cf. the Wambaya NP problem in Ch ~4 of SWB.)

6. Case 

	In our terms, it sounds like 'at' is a case-marking
	adposition, used with definite objects.  This I think
	means that you'll want indefinites to be underspecified
	for CASE, but bare definites to be CASE nom.  Then 
	'at' combines to make a PP that is CASE acc.  And 
	transitive verbs will select complements which are
	either [ HEAD adp ] or [ HEAD noun ] but [ CASE acc ].
	The accusative pronouns can be given appropriate features,
	as well.


-----------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:


#90
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {determiners}
ani qwrat at hspr hmyniin.
ani qra:PAAL.PRES-t at h-spr hmyniin
I read:PAAL.PRES-SG.F ACC the-book:3SG.M interesting:3SG.M
I am reading the interesting book.

I don't think you finished segmenting this one:
h-myniin, no?

#92
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {determiners}
h sprim hale myniinim awti.
h spr-im h-ale myniin-im awti
the book:3SG.M-PL.M the-these interest-PL.M me:ACC
These books interest me.

I couldn't figure out what was wrong with this one,
since it wasn't close to any minimally contrasting examples.
