	discussion of optional determiners

		Your discussion seems to imply that bare NPs can be
		used when they haven't not been previously mentioned in
		the discourse.  Is this so?  In that case, it would seem
		that the bare NPs are ambiguous between definite and
		indefinite readings (though which is appropriate is clear
		from context, given the nature of definiteness).

		As for the `incorporated' nouns, I wonder if they are always
		strictly adjacent to the verb, if they can be modified,
		if there are phonological facts to suggest that they are
		part of the same phonological word as the verb, etc.
		If you can find the answers to such questions, let me know.
		Otherwise, I imagine this aspect of the grammar could be put
		off indefinitely.

	discussion of spurious strings and what might need to be done
	to rule them out

		`case agreement' describes when a modifier of a case-bearing
		element agrees with it in case (so, accusative adjectives to
		go with accusative nouns).  What will fix the overgeneration
		you note is adding _case_ to the grammar.

