---------------------------------------------------------
Notes

One residual problem is that we are currently getting two parses for
embedded interrogatives such as "Ikh freg, tsi iz es efsher". This is
because the q-clause-rule is not restricted to occurting at the top of
a derivation tree and thus we have one parse includes this rule and
one that does not.

EB> You should be able to get rid of the one without the q-clause
by having the V select for a [MC +] complement.

We also noticed that there was some spurious ambiguity with our
determiner lex supertype. We fixed this by changing SUBJ < > to be
SUBJ nonull. This was necessary to prevent articles attaching to
prepositions with the HEAD-SUBJ rule.

EB> I don't think this is the right way to go.  It would make
more sense to have the prepositions be [ SUBJ < > ] themselves.

Our implementation is not specific to indefinite
articles and thus over-generates, permitting "zeyer" to attach to noun
phrases beginning with a definite article.

EB> You can take advantage of the fact that the definite and
indefinite articles constraint COG-ST differently, and have
this "zeyer" constrain the CONT.HOOK.INDEX.COG-ST of its MOD.

Instead of modifying the adjective, "zeyer" is modifying
the exist_q_rel introduced by the object.

EB> This is what I said would be hard...

EB> What's the evidence that this is attaching to the NP anyway?
(The other possibility is that it is attaching to the verb, syntactically.
That would still be a difficult position from which to give it the
correct semantics, however...)

Into various permutations of "Hunts shlofn" in Yiddish. In
addition to various plural forms being realized (which we expect,
since we do not yet constrain plural noun suffixes to apply only to
the nouns on which they occur)

EB> If you're targeting the morpheme-segmented line (i.e., the
underlying form), why aren't these differences normalized at that
level?  It sounds like they're just a matter of morphophonology...

Competence Comparison from lab8 baseline to current state:

		Prev: 48.7  
		New:  56.0

EB> What happened to overgeneration?
