My six Lab 3 phenomena are: Negation, matrix Yes-No questions, Imperatives, Embedded clauses, Coordination, and Relative clauses. I am skipping Adjectives because everything pertaining to the agreement, coordination, and word order of adjectives has been already covered under different headings. There are other issues pertaining to adjectives that I might get to in the future, time permitting. I am skipping Modals for now as a section just because it would be the seventh section. However, there are several examples pertaining to modals in the test suite (#107, #108, #109, #110). 

NEGATION

There are several ways to express negation. I will mention 4 of them.
The word, transliterated as "la", and transcribed as "lo", is the basic equivalent of the English "not", as in "He will not go." as well as the English "no" as in "Are you going? No!". It is also used for non-sentential ngeation. As a sentential negator the word "la" modifies the verb. It must immediately precede a tensed verb (#1), whether it is the main verb (#1) or an auxliary (#107), whichever appears first (#107, #108, #109, #110). The word "la" may not modify an imperative verb form (#5). I don't know if it is an adverb selected for by tensed verbs or a modifier of V; I am still not clear on the distinction. For the time being, I refer to this negator in the gloss as neg1.

#1 - contrasts with #2, #5 - must immediately precede indicative tensed verb (past, present, future, no imperative)
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation}
la a-lk
la a-hlk:PAAL.FUT
neg1 1SG-go:PAAL.FUT
'I won't go.'

#2 - contrasts with #1
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {negation, word order}
alk la
a-hlk:PAAL.FUT  la
1SG-go:PAAL.FUT neg1
'I won't go.'

The second negator, "al" appears in imperative constractions. I refer to it in the gloss as neg2. The verb form that it must immediately precede has to be in the future tense. The result is the negative counterpart of the imperative "tense".

#3 - constrasts with #4, #5, #6, #34  - must immediately precede future verb, indicates imperative
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation, imperatives, word order}
al tlk
al t-hlk:PAAL.FUT
neg2 2SG-go:PAAL.FUT.M
'Don't go.'

#4 - contrasts with #3
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {negation, imperatives, word order}
tlk al
t-hlk:PAAL.FUT al
2SG-go:PAAL.FUT.M neg2
'Don't go.'

#5 - constrasts with #1, #3
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {negation}
al alk
al a-hlk:PAAL.FUT
neg2 1SG-go:PAAL.FUT
'I won't go.'

#6 - contrasts with #3, #33
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation, imperatives}
la tlk
la t-hlk:PAAL.FUT
neg1 2SG-go:PAAL.FUT.M
'You won't go.'

The third negator, glossed as ain:PRES is derived from "ain". The word "ain" is best translated into "there isn't" or "there aren't" and is the negative equivalent of "ie" which best translates into "there is" or "there are". In the examples below, however, this negator functions as the auxiliary verb "don't" and conjugates by person, number and gender. It must immediately precede verb. This form is rarely used in speech.

#7 formal - contrasts with #16
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation}
hwa ainw ba
hwa ain-w bwa:PAAL.PRES
pron:NOM.3SG.M ain:PRES-3SG.M come:PAAL.PRES.3SG.M
"He isn't coming.'

#8 formal -contrasts with #9
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation}
hia ainh bah
hia ain-h bwa:PAAL.PRES-h
pron:NOM.3SG.F ain:PRES-3SG.F come:PAAL.PRES.3SG-F
"She isn't coming.'

#9 formal - contrasts with #8
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {negation, agreement}
hia ainw bah
hia ain-w bwa:PAAL.PRES-h
pron:NOM.3SG.F ain:PRES-3SG.M come:PAAL.PRES.3SG-F
"She isn't coming.'

#10 - this construction is a lot more common in speech than #8
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation}
hia la bah
hia la bwa:PAAL.PRES-h
pron:NOM.3SG.F neg1 come:PAAL.PRES.3SG-F
"She isn't coming.'

The fourth negator, glossed as ainn:PRES is another variant of ain:PRES. Like ain:PRES it is derived from "ain". It can function like ain:PRES, that is, it can function as an auxiliary verb in the same contexts as ain:PRES. When not followed by any complements it functions as a negator of somebody's presence. ain:PRES can function this way only if followed by an NP indicating some location. ainn:PRES also exists only in the present tense and only in the first and third persons. The word order in these constructions is more rigid than in other SV constructions discussed so far. See #111, #112.

#11 - contrasts with #13, #16
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation}
hwa ainnw
hwa ainn-w
pron:NOM.3SG.M ainn:PRES-3SG.M
'He isn't here.'

#12
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation}
hia ainnh
hia ainn-h
pron:NOM.3SG.F ainn:PRES-1SG.F
'She isn't here.'

#13 - contrasts with #11
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {negation}
hwa la
hwa la
pron:NOM.3SG.M neg1
'He isn't here.'

#14 - contrasts with #12
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {negation, agreement}
hia ainnw
hia ainn-w
pron:NOM.3SG.F ainn:PRES-3SG.M
'She isn't here.'

#15
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation}
hia la ph
hia la ph
pron:NOM.3SG.F neg1 here
'She isn't here.'

#16 - contratsts with #7, #11
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {negation}
hwa ainw
hwa ain-w
pron:NOM.3SG.M ain:PRES-3SG.M
'He isn't here.'

#17 Explicitly mentioning "ph" (here) is not necessary; see #12
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation}
hwa ainnw ph
hwa ainn-w ph
pron:NOM.3SG.M ainn:PRES-3SG.M here
'He isn't here.'

#18  Neg1 "la" must immediately precede the tensed verb
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation}
hia la qwrat mhr
hia la qra:PAAL.PRES-t mhr
pron:NOM.3SG.F neg1 read:PAAL.PRES-SG.F fast
'She doesn't read fast.'

#19 - constrasts with #18
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {negation, word order}
hia qwrat mhr la
hia qra:PAAL.PRES-t mhr la
pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PRES-SG.F fast neg1
'She doesn't read fast.'

#20 This is not sentential negation - contrasts with #18
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation, word order}
hia qwrat la mhr ala lav
hia qra:PAAL.PRES-t la mhr ala lav
pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PRES-SG.F neg1 fast but slowly
'She read not fast but slowly.'

#21 This is not sentential negation - contrasts with #18
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation, word order}
la hia qwrat mhr ala hwa
la hia qra:PAAL.PRES-t mhr ala hwa
neg1 pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PRES-SG.F fast but pron:NOM.3SG.M
'It is not she who reads fast but him.'

#22 Neg1 "la" must immediately precede the tensed verb
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation, modals}
hia la ikwlh lqrwa mhr
hia la ikl:PAAL.PRES-h qra:PAAL.INF mhr
pron:NOM.3SG.F neg1 can:PAAL.PRES-SG.F read:PAAL.INF fast
'She can't read fast.'

#23 This is not sentential negation - constrasts with #22
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation, modals, word order}
hia ikwlh la lqrwa mhr
hia ikl:PAAL.PRES-h la qra:PAAL.INF mhr
pron:NOM.3SG.F can:PAAL.PRES-SG.F neg1 read:PAAL.INF fast
'She can (choose to) not read fast.'

matrix YES-NO QUESTIONS

Yes-No questions in Hebrew are formed by changing to a rising intonation the equivalent indicative sentences. There is an optional sentence initial particle, "haim", meaning literally, "the-if". Using this particle is not common in colloquial speech. It is somewhat formal.

#24
Source: a:271
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {matrix yes-no questions}
ie mqwm?
ie mqwm
there_is place:SG.M
'Is there room?'

#25
Source: a:271
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {matrix yes-no questions}
ham ie mqwm?
h-am ie mqwm
the-if there_is place:SG.M
'Is there room?'

#26
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {matrix yes-no questions}
ain mqwm?
ain mqwm
there_is_no place:SG.M
'Is there no room?'

#27  
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {matrix yes-no questions}
hia qwrat mhr?
hia qra:PAAL.PRES-t mhr
pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PRES-SG.F fast
'Does she read fast?'

#28  
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {matrix yes-no questions, negation}
hia la qwrat mhr?
hia la qra:PAAL.PRES-t mhr
pron:NOM.3SG.F neg1 read:PAAL.PRES-SG.F fast
'Doesn't she read fast?'

#29
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {matrix yes-no questions, modals}
hia ikwlh lqrwa mhr?
hia ikl:PAAL.PRES-h qra:PAAL.INF mhr
pron:NOM.3SG.F can:PAAL.PRES-SG.F read:PAAL.INF fast
'Can she read fast?'

#30
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {matrix yes-no questions, negation, modals}
hia la ikwlh lqrwa mhr?
hia la ikl:PAAL.PRES-h qra:PAAL.INF mhr
pron:NOM.3SG.F neg1 can:PAAL.PRES-SG.F read:PAAL.INF fast
'Can't she read fast?'

IMPARATIVES

The imperative "tense"appearing in the following forms only: 2SG.M, 2SG.F, 2PL.M, 2PL.F. I am refering to it as a "tense" because this is the way it was labeled when I studied Hebrew grammar in high-school. 
The 1PL imperative needs to be expressed differently (like the English:  "let's").
In collouqial speech many of these forms are rarely used. The equivalent future forms are used instead. See #37

#31 - constrasts with #32 
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation, imperatives, word order}
al tqra ykeiw 
al t-qra:PAAL.FUT ykeiw
neg2 2SG-read:PAAL.FUT.M now
'Don't read now.'

#32 - constrasts with #31 
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {negation, imperatives, word order}
al ykeiw tqra
al ykeiw t-qra:PAAL.FUT
neg2 now 2SG-read:PAAL.FUT.M
'Don't read now.'

#33 - contrasts with #6, #35
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {negation, imperatives}
la lk
la hlk:PAAL.IMP
neg1 go:PAAL.IMP.2SG.M
'Don't go.'

#34 - contrasts with #3, #35
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {negation, imperatives}
al lk
al hlk:PAAL.IMP
neg2 go:PAAL.IMP.2SG.M
'Don't go.'

#35 - contrasts with #33, #34, #36, #38, #42
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {imperatives}
lk!
hlk:PAAL.IMP
go:PAAL.IMP.2SG.M
'Go!'

#36 normative - I added the "please" because it is weird to use the normative form without it
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {imperatives}
hqeb bbqeh!
qeb:HIFIL.IMP b-bqeh
listen:HIFIL.IMP.2SG in-request:SG.F
'Listen, please!'

#37 colloquial imperative (for most verbs) - contrasts with #36
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {imperatives}
tqeib bbqeh!
t-qeb:HIFIL.FUT b-bqeh
2SG-listen:HIFIL.FUT.M in-request:SG.F
'Listen, please!'

#38 - contrasts with #35, #36, #37 this is one of the verbs the imperative form of which is widely used even colloquially; using the future for this verb is substandard but used
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {imperatives}
tlk!
t-hlk:PAAL.FUT
2SG-go:PAAL.FUT.M
'Go!'

#39 - contrasts with #40
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {agreement}
hiqebtm lama elkm?
qeb:HIFIL.PAST-tm l-h-ama el-km
listen:HIFIL.PAST-2PL.M to-the-mother of-pron:2PL.M
'Have you listened to your mother?'

#40 - contrasts with #39 I suspect this is one of those phenomena we are not supposed to worry about
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {agreement}
hiqebtm lama elkn?
qeb:HIFIL.PAST-tm l-h-ama el-kn
listen:HIFIL.PAST-2PL.M to-the-mother of-pron:2PL.F
'Have you listened to your mother?'

#41
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {agreement}
ham hiqebtm lama elkm?
h-am qeb:HIFIL.PAST-tm l-h-ama el-km
the-if listen:HIFIL.PAST-2PL.M to-the-mother of-pron:2PL.M
'Have you listened to your mother?'

#42 - constrasts with #35, this is not ungrammatical but similarly to the English counterpart, not interchangeable with "Go!"
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {imperatives}
ath lk!
ath hlk:PAAL.IMP
pron:NOM.2SG.M go:PAAL.IMP.2SG.M
'You go!'

COORDINATION

Coordination is boring (i.e. no different from English) except in cases involving agreement of conjoined adjectives in an NP or NPs in a PP. The difference is in the way the two languages handle definiteness.
For example, in English, the determiner "the" is the specifier of the noun and it is combined with the noun.  So in the sentence "I saw the pretty and pleasant girl", we coordinate "pretty and pleasant" which in turn modifies "girl", and that Nom, "pretty and plesant girl" combines with its specifier, "the" to form the NP, "the pretty and pleasant girl"  is an NP. The sentence "I saw the pretty and the pleasant girl" is odd, but if it is at all possible I guess it would be a case of the coordination of the gappy "the pretty" with "the pleasant girl". The reason that "the pretty and pleasant girl" cannot be a case of the coordination of "the pretty" and "pleasant girl" or "the pretty girl" and "pleasant girl" is that "pleasant girl" requires a determiner too. In Hebrew the situation is different. Since definiteness is overtly marked on the nouns and all the adjectives that modify them, we can only say: "the pretty and the pleasant girl" and cannot possibly say "the pretty and pleasant girl" because then the second adjective doesn't agree with the noun in terms of definiteness. So the semantics of the English and the Hebrew structure is the same, but the syntax is different. 

#43
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {imperatives}
ath la lk!
ath la hlk:PAAL.IMP
pron:NOM.2SG.M neg1 go:PAAL.IMP.2SG.M
'Don't you go!'

#44
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {imperatives}
ath al lk!
ath al hlk:PAAL.IMP
pron:NOM.2SG.M neg2 go:PAAL.IMP.2SG.M
'Don't you go!'

#45 - Clause coordination
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination}
hia qrah spr whwa qra xwbrt.
hia qra:PAAL.PAST-h spr w-hwa qra:PAAL.PAST xwbrt
pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F book:SG.M and-pron:NOM.3SG.M read:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M booklet:SG.F
'She read a book and he read a booklet.'

#46 - VP coordination
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination}
hia qrah spr wktbh bmxbrt.
hia qra:PAAL.PAST-h spr w-ktb:PAAL.PAST-h b-h-mxwbrt
pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F book:SG.M and-write:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F in-the-notebook:SG.F
'She read a book and wrote in the notebook.'

#47 - VP coordination with a gap - don't plan to cover this for now
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination}
hia emh at hspr barwn wat hmxbrt yl hewlxn.
hia eim:PAAL.PAST-h at h-spr b-h-arwn w-at h-mxwbrt yl h-ewlxn
pron:NOM.3SG.F put:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F ACC the-book:SG.M in-the-closet:SG.M and-ACC the-notebook:SG.F on the-table:SG.M
'She put the book in the closet and the noteboook on the table.'

#48 - NP coordination - contrast with #49, #50
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination}
hia qrah at hspr wat hxwbrt.
hia qra:PAAL.PAST-h at h-spr w-at h-hxwbrt
pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F ACC the-book:SG.M and-ACC the-booklet:SG.F
'She read the book and the booklet.' 

#49 - Nom coordination - contrast with #48, #50
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination, agreement, case, determiners}
hia qrah at hspr whxwbrt.
hia qra:PAAL.PAST-h at h-spr w-h-hxwbrt
pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F ACC the-book:SG.M and-the-booklet:SG.F
'She read the book and the booklet.' 

#50 - Nom coordination - contrast with #48, #49
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination, agreement, case, determiners}
hia qrah at hspr wxwbrt.
hia qra:PAAL.PAST-h at h-spr w-xwbrt
pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F ACC the-book:SG.M and-booklet:SG.F
'She read the book and a booklet.' 

#51 - Adjective coordination - contrast with #52
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination, agreement, case, determiners, adjectives}
hia qrah at hspr hxde whmyniin.
hia qra:PAAL.PAST-h at h-spr h-xde w-h-myniin
pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F ACC the-book:SG.M the-new:SG.M and-the-interesting:SG.M
'She read the new and interesting book.' 

#52 - Adjective coordination - contrast with #51
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {coordination, agreement, case, determiners, adjectives}
hia qrah at hspr hxde wmyniin.
hia qra:PAAL.PAST-h at h-spr h-xde w-myniin
pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F ACC the-book:SG.M the-new:SG.M and-interesting:SG.M
'She read the new and interesting book.' 

#53 - Adjective coordination - contrast with #54, #55, #56, #57, #58
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination, adjectives}
raiti ildwt xvnwt wgdwlwt.
rah:PAAL.PAST-ti ild-wt xvn-wt w-gdwl-wt
see:PAAL.PAST-1SG girl:F-PL little-PL.F and-big-PL.F
'I saw little girls and big girls.'

#54 - Adjective coordination - contrast with #53, #55, #56, #57, #58 - it's a bit ambiguous in English, not in Hebrew (though obviously given #53, it's syntactically ambiguous I cannot get the 'pretty girls and pleasant girls' reading one can presumably get in English)
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination, adjectives}
raiti ildwt ipwt wnyimwt.
rah:PAAL.PAST-ti ild-wt ip-wt w-nyim-wt
see:PAAL.PAST-1SG girl:F-PL pretty-PL.F and-pleasant-PL.F
'I saw pretty and pleasant girls.'

#55 - Adjective coordination - contrast with #53, #54, #56, #57, #58
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination, adjectives}
raiti at hildwt hxvnwt wat hgdwlwt.
rah:PAAL.PAST-ti at h-ild-wt h-xvn-wt w-at h-gdwl-wt
see:PAAL.PAST-1SG ACC the-girl:F-PL the-little-PL.F and-ACC the-big-PL.F
'I saw the little girls and the big girls.'

#56 - Adjective coordination - contrast with #53, #54, #55, #57, #58
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination, adjectives}
raiti at hildwt hipwt wat hnyimwt.
rah:PAAL.PAST-ti at h-ild-wt h-ip-wt w-at h-nyim-wt
see:PAAL.PAST-1SG ACC the-girl:F-PL the-pretty-PL.F and-ACC the-pleasant-PL.F
'I saw the pretty girls and the pleasat girls.'

#57 - Adjective coordination - contrast with #53, #54, #55, #56, #58
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination, adjectives}
raiti at hildwt hipwt whnyimwt.
rah:PAAL.PAST-ti at h-ild-wt h-ip-wt w-h-nyim-wt
see:PAAL.PAST-1SG ACC the-girl:F-PL the-pretty-PL.F and-the-pleasant-PL.F
'I saw the pretty and pleasat girls.'

#58 - Adjective coordination - contrast with #53, #54, #55, #56, #57 - this is odd in both Hebrew and English - ot means that the girls are simultanesouly little and big
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination, adjectives}
raiti at hildwt hqtnwt whgdwlwt.
rah:PAAL.PAST-ti at h-ild-wt h-qtn-wt w-h-gdwl-wt
see:PAAL.PAST-1SG ACC the-girl:F-PL the-little-PL.F and-the-big-PL.F
'I saw the little and big girls.'

#59 - Verb coordination - contrast with #60
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination}
hwa rc wkwpc
hwa rwc:PAAL.PRES w-kpc:PAAL.PRES
pron:NOM.3SG.M run:PAAL.PRES-SG.M and-jump:PAAL.PRES.SG.M
'He runs and jumps.'

#60 - Verb coordination - contrast with #59 - same as English
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {coordination, agreement}
hwa rc wkwpct
hwa rwc:PAAL.PRES w-kpc:PAAL.PRES-t
pron:NOM.3SG.M run:PAAL.PRES-SG.M and-jump:PAAL.PRES-SG.F
'He runs and jumps.'

#61 - Subject NP coordination - contrast with #62
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination, agreement}
hwa whia rcim
hwa w-hia rwc:PAAL.PRES-im
pron:NOM.3SG.M and-pron:NOM.3SG.F run:PAAL.PRES-PL.M
'He and she run.'

#62 - Subject NP coordination - contrast with #61 - mixed gender subject needs masculine verb
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {coordination, agreement}
hwa whia rcwt.
hwa w-hia rwc:PAAL.PRES-wt
pron:NOM.3SG.M and-pron:NOM.3SG.F run:PAAL.PRES-PL.F
'He and she run.'

#63 - PP coordination
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination}
hia emh sprim barwn wyl hewlxn.
hia eim:PAAL.PAST-h spr-im b-h-arwn w-yl h-ewlxn
pron:NOM.3SG.F put:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F book:M-PL in-the-closet:SG.M and-on the-table:SG.M
'She put books in the closet and on the table.'

#64 - complement of prep NP coordination - contrast with #65, #66
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination, determiners, agreement}
hia emh sprim yl ewlxnwt wksawt.
hia eim:PAAL.PAST-h spr-im yl ewlxn-wt w-ksa-wt
pron:NOM.3SG.F put:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F book:M-PL on table:M-PL and-chair:M-PL
'She put books on tables and chairs.'

#65 - complement of prep NP coordination - contrast with #64, #66
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {coordination, determiners, agreement}
hia emh sprim yl hewlxnwt whksawt.
hia eim:PAAL.PAST-h spr-im yl h-ewlxn-wt w-h-ksa-wt
pron:NOM.3SG.F put:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F book:M-PL on the-table:M-PL and-the-chair:M-PL
'She put books on the tables and the chairs.'

#66 - complement of prep NP coordination - contrast with #64, #65 - this seems different from English
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {coordination, determiners, agreement}
hia emh sprim yl hewlxnwt wksawt.
hia eim:PAAL.PAST-h spr-im yl h-ewlxn-wt w-ksa-wt
pron:NOM.3SG.F put:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F book:M-PL on the-table:M-PL and-chair:M-PL
'She put books on the tables and chairs.'

RELATIVE CLAUSES

Hebrew has a special relative word "e" (pronounced, "sh") that marks a clause a relative (that same "e" is also the  complementizer in embedded clauses) . When the relative is a direct object the relative clause contains an accusative resumptive pronoun (#67) but only optionally (#73). The relative "e" must attach to the first element of the relative clause (#67, #68, #69). When the relative is a subject the resumptive pronoun is obligatorily absent (#74, #75), unless the sentence has no verb in which case a nomintive personal pronoun must be present to function as a verb (#76, #77). The "e" must attach to some word and may not stand independently (#78). When the relative is in a PP, the resumptive pronoun is obligatory (#93, #94) as the preposition cannot be left dangling.  When the relative is a possessor as in "the man whose book" (#84), there is an obligatory resumptive pronoun, but that is not surprising, as unlike the English "whose" the relative marker "e" carries insufficient information. The one interesting construction involving a relative is #92. Unlike in English it is possible in Hebrew to relativize an NP that is a corrdinated structure, and say "The man, that he and his mother are doctors...".

#67 - contrast with #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, #73, #93, #94
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
hspr eawtw qrati hih mcxiq
h-spr e-awtw qra:PAAL.PAST-ti hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-book:SG.M that-pron:ACC.3SG.M read:PAAL.PAST-1SG be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The book which I read was funny.'

#68 - contrast with #67, #69, #70, #71, #72, #73
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
hspr eqrati awtw hih mcxiq
h-spr e-qra:PAAL.PAST-ti awtw hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-book:SG.M that-read:PAAL.PAST-1SG pron:ACC.3SG.M be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The book which I read was funny.'

#69 - contrast with #67, #68, #70, #71, #72, #73
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
hspr qrati eawtw hih mcxiq
h-spr qra:PAAL.PAST-ti e-awtw hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-book:SG.M read:PAAL.PAST-1SG that-pron:ACC.3SG.M be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The book which I read was funny.'

#70 - contrast with #67, #68, #69, #71, #72, #73
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
hspr awtw eqrati hih mcxiq.
h-spr awtw e-qra:PAAL.PAST-ti hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-book:SG.M pron:ACC.3SG.M that-read:PAAL.PAST-1SG be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The book which I read was funny.'

#71 - contrast with #67, #68, #69, #70, #72, #73 - this is substandard as 'at' is required but not entirely impossible; so if this senetnce were OK it would mean this rather than what #67 means
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
eawtw hspr qrati hih mcxiq.
e-awtw h-spr qra:PAAL.PAST-ti hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
e-same.SG.M the-book:SG.M read:PAAL.PAST-1SG be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'(The fact) that I read the same book was funny.'

#72 - contrast with #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #73
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
awtw hspr eqrati hih mcxiq.
awtw h-spr e-qra:PAAL.PAST-ti hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
same.SG.M the-book:SG.M that-read:PAAL.PAST-1SG be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The same book that I read was funny.'

#73 - - contrast with #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, #93, #94 - #73 is more common than #67
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
hspr eqrati hih mcxiq.
h-spr e-qra:PAAL.PAST-ti hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-book:SG.M that-read:PAAL.PAST-1SG be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The book I read was funny.'

#74 - contrast with #75, #76, #77
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
haie eqra at hspr hih mcxiq.
h-aie e-qra:PAAL.PAST at h-spr hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-man:SG.M that-read:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M ACC the-book:SG.M be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The man who read the book was funny.'

#75 - contrast with #74, #76, #77
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
haie ehwa qra at hspr hih mcxiq.
h-aie e-hwa qra:PAAL.PAST at h-spr hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-man:SG.M that-pron:NOM.3SG.M read:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M ACC the-book:SG.M be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The man who read the book was funny.'

#76 - contrast with #74, #75, #77, #78, #86. #87 the pronoun hwa is functioning as a verb here
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
haie ehwa hrwpa hih mcxiq.
h-aie e-hwa h-rwpa hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-man:SG.M that-pron:NOM.3SG.M the-doctor:SG.M be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The man who is the doctor was funny.'

#77 - contrast with #75, #76, #78
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
haie ehih hrwpa hih mcxiq.
h-aie e-hih:PAAL.PAST h-rwpa hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-man:SG.M that-be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M the-doctor:SG.M be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The man who was the doctor was funny.'

#78 - contrast with #75, #76, #77
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
haie e hrwpa hih mcxiq.
h-aie e h-rwpa hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-man:SG.M that the-doctor:SG.M be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The man who is the doctor was funny.'

#79 - contrast with #80, #81, #82, #83
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
htwknh ektbti yma at hspr hith mcxiqh
h-twknh e-ktb:PAAL.PAST-ti ym-a at h-spr hih:PAAL.PAST-h mcxiq-h
the-software:SG.F that-write:PAAL.PAST-1SG with-3SG.F ACC the-book:SG.M be:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F funny-SG.F
'The software I wrote the book with was funny.'

#80 - contrast with #79, #81, #82, #83
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
htwknh eyma ktbti at hspr hith mcxiqh
h-twknh e-ym-a ktb:PAAL.PAST-ti at h-spr hih:PAAL.PAST-h mcxiq-h
the-software:SG.F that-with-3SG.F write:PAAL.PAST-1SG ACC the-book:SG.M be:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F funny-SG.F
'The software I wrote the book with was funny.'

#81 - contrast with #79, #80, #82, #83
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
htwknh eat hspr ktbti yma hith mcxiqh
h-twknh e-at h-spr ktb:PAAL.PAST-ti ym-a hih:PAAL.PAST-h mcxiq-h
the-software:SG.F that-ACC the-book:SG.M write:PAAL.PAST-1SG with-3SG.F be:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F funny-SG.F
'The software I wrote the book with was funny.'

#82 - contrast with #79, #80, #81, #83
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
htwknh eat hspr yma ktbti hith mcxiqh
h-twknh e-at h-spr ym-a ktb:PAAL.PAST-ti hih:PAAL.PAST-h mcxiq-h
the-software:SG.F that-ACC the-book:SG.M with-3SG.F write:PAAL.PAST-1SG be:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F funny-SG.F
'The software I wrote the book with was funny.'

#83 - contrast with #79, #80, #81, #82
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
htwknh eat hspr ktbti ym hith mcxiqh
h-twknh e-at h-spr ktb:PAAL.PAST-ti ym hih:PAAL.PAST-h mcxiq-h
the-software:SG.F that-ACC the-book:SG.M write:PAAL.PAST-1SG with be:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F funny-SG.F
'The software I wrote the book with was funny.'

#84
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
haie eat hspr elw qrati hih mcxiq.
h-aie e-at h-spr el-w qra:PAAL.PAST-ti hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-man:SG.M that-ACC the-book:SG.M of-peon:3SG.M read:PAAL.PAST-1SG  be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The man whose book I read was funny.'

#85
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
hspr eqrati at hprq hih mcxiq.
h-spr e-qra:PAAL.PAST-ti at h-prq hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-book:SG.M that-read:PAAL.PAST-1SG  ACC the-chapter:SG.M be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'*The book which I read the chapter was funny.'

#86 - contrast with #76
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
haie ehwa rwpa hih mcxiq.
h-aie e-hwa rwpa hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-man:SG.M that-pron:NOM.3SG.M doctor:SG.M be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The man who is a doctor was funny.'

#87 - contrast with #76, #86, #88
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
haie ebarwn hih mcxiq.
h-aie e-b-h-arwn hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-man:SG.M that-in-the-closet:SG.M be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The man who is in the closet was funny.'

#88 - contrast with #76, #87
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
haie barwn hih mcxiq.
h-aie b-h-arwn hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-man:SG.M in-the-closet:SG.M be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The man in the closet was funny.'

#89 - contrast with #76, #86, #87, #88
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
haie eph hih mcxiq.
h-aie e-ph hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-man:SG.M that-here be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The man who is here was funny.'

#90 - contrast with #76, #86, #91 - so no need for hwa if adjective
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
haie enxmd hih mcxiq.
h-aie e-nxmd hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-man:SG.M that-nice:SG.M be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The man who is nice was funny.'

#91 - contrast with #76, #86, #91 - must have hwa if noun
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
haie erwpa hih mcxiq.
h-aie e-rwpa hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-man:SG.M that-doctor:SG.M be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The man who is a doctor was funny.'

#92 - contrast with #114
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses, coordination}
haie ehwa wamw rwpaim hih mcxiq.
h-aie e-hwa w-am-w rwpa-im hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-man:SG.M that-pron:NOM.3SG.M and-mother-his doctor:M-PL be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The man who is a doctor and whose mother is a doctor was funny.'

#93 contrast with #67, #73, #94 - the pronoun in a direct object relative is optional, but when the pronoun is in a PP it is obligatory (the prep cannot be left dangling)
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
hspr eyliw dibrti hia mcxiq
h-spr e-yli-w dbr:PIEL.PAST-ti hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-book:SG.M that-on-pron:3SG.M speak:PIEL.PAST-1SG be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The book I spoke about was funny.'

#94 contrast with #67, #73, #93 - the pronoun in a direct object relative is optional, but when the pronoun is in a PP it is obligatory (the prep cannot be left dangling)
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {relative clauses}
hspr eyl dibrti hia mcxiq
h-spr e-yl dbr:PIEL.PAST-ti hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-book:SG.M that-on speak:PIEL.PAST-1SG be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The book I spoke about was funny.'

#95
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses, coordination}
haie whaeh eylihm dibrti hi-w mcxiqim.
h-aie w-h-aeh e-yli-hm dbr:PIEL.PAST-ti hih:PAAL.PAST-w mcxiq-im
the-man:SG.M and-the-woman:SG.F that-on-pron:3PL.M speak:PIEL.PAST-1SG be:PAAL.PAST-3PL.M funny-PL.M
'The man and the woman about whom I spoke were funny.'

EMBEDDED CLAUSES

Embedded clauses are boring as they are pretty much the same as their English counterparts. One difference that unlike in English, in Hebrew the complementizer may not be optionally omitted (#102).

#96 - contrasts with #97, #98, #103, #102
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {embedded clauses}
ani iwdy ehia qwrat
ani idy:PAAL.PRES e-hia qra:PAAL.PRES-t
pron:NOM.1SG know:PAAL.PRES.SG.M that-pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PRES:SG.F
'I know that she reads.'

#97 - contrasts with #96, #98
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {embedded clauses, negation}
ani la iwdy am hia qwrat
ani la idy:PAAL.PRES am hia qra:PAAL.PRES-t
pron:NOM.1SG neg1 know:PAAL.PRES.SG.M if pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PRES:SG.F
'I don't know whether she reads.'

#98 - contrasts with #96, #97
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {embedded clauses, negation}
ani la iwdy ehia qwrat
ani la idy:PAAL.PRES e-hia qra:PAAL.PRES-t
pron:NOM.1SG neg1 know:PAAL.PRES.SG.M that-pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PRES:SG.F
'I don't know that she reads.'

#99 - contrasts with #100, #101, #102
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {embedded clauses}
ani mamin ehia qwrat
ani amn:HIFIL.PRES e-hia qra:PAAL.PRES-t
pron:NOM.1SG believe:HIFIL.PRES.SG.M that-pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PRES:SG.F
'I believe that she reads.'

#100 - contrasts with #99, #101
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {embedded clauses, negation}
ani la mamin am hia qwrat
ani la amn:HIFIL.PRES am hia qra:PAAL.PRES-t
pron:NOM.1SG neg1 believe:HIFIL.PRES.SG.M if pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PRES:SG.F
'I don't believe if she reads.'

#101 - contrasts with #99, #100
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {embedded clauses, negation}
ani la mamin ehia qwrat
ani la amn:HIFIL.PRES e-hia qra:PAAL.PRES-t
pron:NOM.1SG neg1 believe:HIFIL.PRES.SG.M that-pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PRES:SG.F
'I don't believe that she reads.'

#102 - constrasts with #99
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {embedded clauses}
ani mamin hia qwrat
ani amn:HIFIL.PRES hia qra:PAAL.PRES-t
pron:NOM.1SG believe:HIFIL.PRES.SG.M pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PRES:SG.F
'I believe she reads.'

#103 - contrasts with #96, #104
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {embedded clauses}
ani iwdy am hia qwrat
ani idy:PAAL.PRES am hia qra:PAAL.PRES-t
pron:NOM.1SG know:PAAL.PRES.SG.M  if pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PRES:SG.F
'I know whether she reads.'

#104 - contrasts with #103
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {embedded clauses}
ani mamin am hia qwrat
ani amn:HIFIL.PRES am hia qra:PAAL.PRES-t
pron:NOM.1SG believe:HIFIL.PRES.SG.M if pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PRES:SG.F
'I believe whether she reads.'

#105 - contrasts with #103, #104, #106
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {embedded clauses}
ani ewal am hia qwrat
ani eal:PAAL.PRES am hia qra:PAAL.PRES-t
pron:NOM.1SG ask:PAAL.PRES.SG.M if pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PRES:SG.F
'I ask whether she reads.'

#106 - contrasts with #103, #104, #105
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {embedded clauses}
ani ewal e-hia qwrat
ani eal:PAAL.PRES e-hia qra:PAAL.PRES-t
pron:NOM.1SG ask:PAAL.PRES.SG.M that-pron:NOM.3SG.F read:PAAL.PRES:SG.F
'I ask that she reads.'

MODALS 

I am not really covering modals here. These examples are here as examples of negation.

#107 - contrasts with #108, #109 - must immediately precede indicative first tensed verb (past, present, future, no imperative)
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation, modals}
hia la hith ixwlh llkt
hia la hih:PAAL.PAST-h ixl:PAAL.PAST-h hlk:PAAL.INF
pron:NOM.3SG.F neg1 be:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F can:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F go:PAAL.INF
'She couldn't go.'

#108 - contrasts with #107, #109, #110 - must immediately precede indicative first tensed verb (past, present, future, no imperative)
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation, modals}
hia la ixwlh hith ixwlh llkt
hia la ixl:PAAL.PAST-h hih:PAAL.PAST-h hlk:PAAL.INF
pron:NOM.3SG.F neg1 can:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F be:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F go:PAAL.INF
'She couldn't go.'

#109 - contrasts with #107, #109, #110 - must immediately precede indicative first tensed verb (past, present, future, no imperative)
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {negation, modals}
hia ixwlh la hith llkt
hia ixl:PAAL.PAST-h la hih:PAAL.PAST-h hlk:PAAL.INF
pron:NOM.3SG.F can:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F neg1 be:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F go:PAAL.INF
'She couldn't go.'

#110 - contrasts with #107, #108, #109 - must immediately precede indicative first tensed verb (past, present, future, no imperative)
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {negation, modals}
hia hith la ixwlh llkt
hia hih:PAAL.PAST-h  la ixl:PAAL.PAST-h hlk:PAAL.INF
pron:NOM.3SG.F be:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F neg1 can:PAAL.PAST-3SG.F go:PAAL.INF
'She couldn't go.'

#111 - contrasts with #11
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: u
Phenomena: {negation}
ainnw hwa
ainn-w hwa
ainn:PRES-3SG.M pron:NOM.3SG.M 
'He isn't here.'

#112 - contrasts with #113
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation}
ainni
ainn-i
ainn:PRES-1SG
'I am not present.'

#113 - contrasts with #112
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {negation}
ainni ani
ainn-i ani
ainn:PRES-1SG pron:NOM.1SG
'I am not me/I/myself.'

#114 - contrast with #92
Source: author
Vetted: t
Judgment: g
Phenomena: {relative clauses, coordination}
haie ehwa weamw rwpaim hih mcxiq.
h-aie e-hwa w-e-am-w rwpa-im hih:PAAL.PAST mcxiq
the-man:SG.M that-pron:NOM.3SG.M and-that-mother-his doctor:M-PL be:PAAL.PAST.3SG.M funny:SG.M
'The man who is a doctor and whose mother is a doctor was funny.'

#Additional topics should there be time
#Construct nouns, possessives other than "brother of John" and "of mine" variety, newly discovered differences in distribution of pronouns and other NPs, additional word order constraints (indefinite NPs, "hia crix", p101 of Melnik's dissertation, "*raiti tofrim et ...smalot", modals