Notes
-------------------------------------------------------

>> Please put your writeup in the top-level directory so I don't
have to go hunting for it.

	As our first grammar of Ryukyuan (ISO: mvi), we have implemented following 
	features.

>> Somewhere you need to document exactly which variety of Ryukyuan you
are working on.  Is mvi the code for the macro language, or for a
more specific variety?  In various places in the write up, you talk about
Miyako and also Irabu Ryukyuan.  Are these two different varieties?  If
so, are they very different from each other?  You should settle on one.

	Although Ryukyuan pronoun has distinction in person and numbers in the surface 
	form. However there is no valence restriction in terms of person and number (i.e. 
	there is no subject-verb agreement), therefore we did not include that in our 
	test suite.

>> In order to make sure that you get the pronouns all covered,
they should all be in your testsuite.

>> In general, the write ups are easier to read if you give the description
first and then provide the examples.

	There is a hierarchy of case particle usage, and pronoun only takes =ga as nom/
	gen form, and =nu elsewhere (although there are some minor distinctions, but it 
	was out of this lab2's scope).

>> I'm not sure what "hierarchy" means here.  Also, I think you need to make
two separate tables like this:

	  CASE            | FORM    | EXAMPLE
	  ----------------+---------+---------------
	  nominative(nom) | =ga/=nu | ba-ga
	  genitive(gen)   | =ga/=nu | ba-ga
	  accusative(acc) | =u      | ba-a --> banu-
	  dative(dat)     | =n      | ba-n --> ban-

... one for the pronouns and one for the nouns.


		ba ga iditar
		ba=ga idi-tar
		1SG=GEN exit-PAST
		My exited.

	Here the particle `ga' can mean either mean `nom' or `gen'.  There is no
	destinction that blocks this being parsed ONLY as CASE nom.

>> You don't have anything with the case value gen in the choices file
you submitted.  Is there actually something wrong with this example, or is
it grammatical just with an incorrect gloss?
